HOME/ ADJUDICATION

Adjudication Claims

"We blend technical, legal, and regulatory expertise to provide Adjudication Application advice to navigate disputes that threaten the successful completion of your projects."

Construction disputes can be complex, time-consuming, and costly affairs, often threatening the successful completion of projects and straining relationships among stakeholders. In Australia, where the construction industry is a significant contributor to the economy, resolving these disputes efficiently is paramount. One of the key mechanisms designed to address these issues is the use of Adjudication Claims. Adjudication offers a pragmatic and efficient avenue for resolving disputes in the construction and infrastructure sectors. By understanding the process and adopting best practices, parties can effectively manage disputes, minimising their impact on project delivery and financial outcomes. When it comes to project cash flow problems, our inhouse adjudicators bring together the technical, legal, and regulatory skills that are essential ingredients for a successful adjudication submission. While not all projects require this vital regulatory skill, if called upon CCR will deliver.

Why Choose CCR

At CCR, we don’t just understand adjudication on a technical or legal level, we understand the human cost of not being paid. Our Director, Chris Thompson, has lived through the reality of having his own business brought to its knees by a bad payer. That experience changed the course of his career. Today, he fights to protect contractors, consultants, and suppliers from facing that same hardship. By sharing his story, we hope to make the adjudication process feel more accessible, more relatable, and to remind those currently struggling that there is a pathway to recover what you are rightfully owed.

What is Adjudication?

Adjudication refers to a dispute resolution process where an independent third party, known as an adjudicator, is appointed to make a decision that is temporarily binding on the parties involves, until the dispute is finally resolved through arbitration, litigation, or agreement. In Australia, the process is governed by various pieces of legislation, including the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payments Act (SOPA) across different states and territories. This Act ensures that disputes concerning payment under construction contracts can be resolved in a manner that is not only expeditious but also cost-effective, thereby safeguarding cash flow within the industry – a critical component for the completion of projects.

When to Consider Adjudication

Adjudication is particularly suited to resolving disputes that arise from or relate to construction contracts. This could include issues such as delays, the quality of work, non-payment, or any other matter under the contract where there is disagreement. The process is designed to provide a rapid resolution, often within 28-42 days from the litigation process, making it an attractive option for parties seeking to avoid prolonged disruption to their projects. It is essential for parties involved in infrastructure projects to recognise the signs of escalating disputes early and to consider adjudication as a viable option before conflict impacts the projects timeline or budget significantly.

Why to Consider Adjudication

Our Solutions

SOPA

CCR’s team have been in the adjudication claims business since the Security of Payment Act was first implemented in NSW. SOPA is our specialty, and we offer Adjudication Application advice when fair payments have not been made on schedule. This act was created to assist contractors, consultants, and suppliers in the recovery of owed money. It enables a faster resolution of non-payment and makes it easier to hold debtors to account.

Fair payments are not always made to schedule, or at all, in the construction sector. Often, those involved in a construction project may have their money tied up in different areas or be operating on a debt business model that makes them prone to being unable to pay.

Whatever the reason for non-payment, whether debt or simple dishonesty, the responsibility exists for every party entering into an agreement to do so only if they are certain they will be able to meet the terms and mutual expectations.

If you are establishing partnerships, ensure you are using a suite of contracts that is sound and falls in line with the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act. If those you transact with are not paying on time or at all, consider an adjudication application expert who can assist you to input an effective application.

Preparation and Defence of SOPA Claims

The success of an adjudication process largely depends on the preparation undertaken by the disputing parties. Preparation involves a clear understanding of the contract terms, the nature of the dispute, and the evidence required to support your position. It is crucial to gather all relevant documents, including the contract, correspondence, progress reports, and any other evidence that supports your claim or defence. Additionally, identifying the appropriate adjudicator for your specific dispute is a key step. In Australia, adjudicators are typically professionals with extensive experience in the construction industry, such as engineers, quantity surveyors, or lawyers. They must also be accredited under the relevant SOPA legislation. Choosing an adjudicator with the right expertise for the dispute can significantly influence the outcome.

While not all adjudications involve a formal hearing, some may require a meeting or a hearing to allow both parties to present their case before the adjudicator. The structure and formality of these hearings can vary significantly, depending on the complexity of the dispute and the preferences of the adjudicator. In Australia, the adjudication process is designed to be less formal than court proceedings, aiming to resolve disputes quickly and efficiently. However, parties should be prepared to succinctly present their arguments, answer questions from the adjudicator, and clarify any points of contention. It’s also an opportunity to highlight the strengths of your position and the weaknesses in the other party’s case.